Clark Aldrich over at Learning Circuits posted a worthwhile discussion about what games for learning should be called.  Serious Games? Simulations? Game-based Learning? Immersive Learning?
The discussion itself is interesting, but regardless of what games in education should be /will be / are currently called the distinctions that Aldrich draws creates a good opportunity for discussion and a better understanding of the full scope of applications and possibilities.
What's in a Name?
7:19 AM
 | 
Tags:
assumptions,
news
 | 
 
 
				 This entry was posted on 7:19 AM
	and is filed under          
assumptions
,
news
						.
							
				You can follow any responses to this entry through 
				the RSS 2.0 feed. 
				
				
					You can leave a response,
		        
				or trackback from your own site.
			
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
0 comments:
Post a Comment