Clark Aldrich over at Learning Circuits posted a worthwhile discussion about what games for learning should be called. Serious Games? Simulations? Game-based Learning? Immersive Learning?
The discussion itself is interesting, but regardless of what games in education should be /will be / are currently called the distinctions that Aldrich draws creates a good opportunity for discussion and a better understanding of the full scope of applications and possibilities.
What's in a Name?
7:19 AM | Tags: assumptions, news |
This entry was posted on 7:19 AM and is filed under assumptions , news . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment